WTO in the context of international law

Learning Outcomes Assessed:

LO2:. Exhibit a critical awareness associated with procedural and substantive legal issues looking at aspects of the Law of Contract in the context of international law

 

Assessment Brief

 

Evaluate the role of the WTO in the context of International Law.

 Remember to put the cases within the text and footnote it.

Oscola reference

 

 

Specific Assessment Criteria:

(Please note that the General Assessment Criteria will also apply.

 

First class (70% and above):

Students will provide an in-depth appraisal of the effectiveness of a sustainable tourism plan, demonstrating excellent critical reasoning skills. Focused and justified recommendations will be made as to how problems/weaknesses identified in the plan may be overcome, and sustainability improved.  Extensive research demonstrating use of a wide range of current secondary research sources will be evident. Academic style and referencing will be excellent. 

 

Second class (50-69%):

Students will provide a comprehensive appraisal of the effectiveness of a sustainable tourism plan, demonstrating critical reasoning skills. Justified recommendations will be made as to how problems/weaknesses identified in the plan may be overcome, and sustainability improved. Research demonstrating use of a wide range of current secondary research sources will be evident. Academic style and referencing will be good. 

 

Third class (40-49%):

Students will provide a satisfactory appraisal of the effectiveness of a sustainable tourism plan, demonstrating critical reasoning skills. Considered recommendations will be made as to how problems/weaknesses identified in the plan may be overcome, and sustainability improved. Research demonstrating use of a range of current secondary research sources will be evident. Academic style and referencing will be fair. 

 

Fail (39% and below): Students who do not meet the requirements of a third class grade will not successfully complete the assessment activity.

 

 

Minimum Secondary Research Source Requirements:

 

 

Level HE7 – It is expected that the Reference List will contain between sevteen  to twenty six  sources. As a MINIMUM the Reference List should include fifteen refereed academic journals and seven academic books.

 

GENERAL ASSESSMENT GUIDELINES LEVEL HE7 (MASTERS)    Relevance Knowledge Argument/Analysis Structure Presentation Written English Research/Referencing

DISTINCTION

 

 

70+

 

Directly relevant to title.  Addresses all of the implications and assumptions of the title.

Demonstrates an excellent knowledge of theory and practice for this level.

 

Expertly interprets appropriate concepts and theoretical models. 

 

Demonstrates originality in conceptual understanding. 

Presents a comprehensive critique of key research material resulting in clear, original and illuminating conclusions.

 

Demonstrates distinctive and creative thinking.

 

Produces exceptional work that makes a contribution to the development of knowledge and understanding in the subject area.

Coherently articulated and logically structured. An appropriate format is used.  

Excellent presentational style & layout, appropriate to the type of assignment. Effective inclusion of figures, tables, plates (FTP).  

A very well written answer with standard spelling and grammar.  Style is clear, resourceful and academic.

 

All sources accurately cited in the text and a extensive appropriate reference list in the correct style is provided.  

PASS

Very Good Quality

60-69% Directly relevant to title

 

Addresses key implications of the issues.

Demonstrates a sound knowledge of theory and practice for this level.

 

Comprehensively interprets appropriate concepts and theoretical models. 

 

Demonstrates originality in conceptual understanding

Presents a cohesive critique of key research material resulting in clear and original conclusions.

 

Demonstrates insightful and creative thinking.

 

Produces superior work that makes a contribution to the development of knowledge and understanding in the subject area

For the most part coherently articulated and logically constructed. An appropriate format is used.  

The presentational style & layout is correct for the type of assignment. Effective inclusion of FTP.

Well written with standard spelling and grammar. Style is clear and academic.

 

All sources accurately cited in the text and an appropriate reference list in the correct style is provided.

Good Quality

 

50-59%

Generally addresses the title and its implications. 

 

Minor irrelevance in places.

Demonstrates an adequate knowledge of theory and practice for this level.

 

Competently interprets some appropriate concepts and theoretical models. 

 

Demonstrates conceptual understanding.

Presents a critique of key research material resulting in original conclusions. Loss of focus in places.

 

Demonstrates creative thinking.

 

Produces satisfactory work that makes some contribution to the development of knowledge and understanding in the subject area.

Adequate attempt at articulation and logical structure. 

 

An acceptable format is used.

The presentational style & layout is correct for the type of assignment.

 

Inclusion of FTP but lacks selectivity.

Competently written with  minor lapses in spelling and grammar.

 

Style is readable and mainly academic.

 

Most sources accurately cited in the text and an appropriate reference list in the correct style is provided.  

Satisfactory Quality

40-49% Some key implications of issues explored.

 

Irrelevant and/or superficial arguments in places.

 

Demonstrates knowledge of theory and practice for this level with minor omissions.

 

Interprets some appropriate concepts and theoretical models. 

 

Demonstrates conceptual understanding in places.

Presents some critique of key research material, although descriptive in places.  Some original conclusions.

 

 

Some attempt at articulation and logical structure. 

 

An acceptable format is used.

The presentational style & layout is largely correct for the type of assignment.

 

Some inappropriate use of FTP.

Generally competent writing although intermittent lapses in grammar and spelling.   Style hinders clarity in places and is not academic throughout.

Relevant sources cited. Minor weaknesses in referencing technique.

FAIL

Borderline Fail

 

 

35-39%

 

Some significant degree of irrelevance to the title is common. 

 

Issues are addressed at a superficial level and in unchallenging terms.  

Demonstrates weaknesses in knowledge of theory and practice for this level.

 

Limited understanding and application of concepts. 

A basic argument is presented, but too descriptive or narrative in style.  Limited originality. Conclusions are not clearly stated.

Poorly structured. Lack of articulation. Format deficient.

For the type of assignment the presentational style &/or layout is lacking. 

 

FTP ignored in text or not used where clearly needed.

Deficiencies in spelling and grammar makes reading difficult in places.

 

Simplistic or repetitious style impairs clarity.

Inappropriate sources and poor referencing technique.  

Fail

 

<34%

 

Relevance to the title is intermittent or missing. 

 

The topic is reduced to its vaguest and least challenging terms.  

Demonstrates a lack of basic knowledge of either theory or practice for this level, with little evidence of conceptual understanding.

Severely limited arguments. Descriptive or narrative in style with no evidence of critique and originality. Conclusions are sparse.

Unstructured.  Lack of articulation. Format deficient.

For the type of assignment the presentational style &/or layout is lacking. FTP as above.

Poorly written with numerous deficiencies in grammar, spelling, expression and style.

 

An absence of academic sources and poor

Click here to request for this assignment help

Solution:

10% off for this assignment.

Our Prices Start at $11.99. As Our First Client, Use Coupon Code GET10 to claim 10% Discount This Month!!

Why US?

100% Confidentiality

Information about customers is confidential and never disclosed to third parties.

Timely Delivery

No missed deadlines – 97% of assignments are completed in time.

Original Writing

We complete all papers from scratch. You can get a plagiarism report.

Money Back

If you are convinced that our writer has not followed your requirements, feel free to ask for a refund.